http://news.com.com/2100-1001-983175.html?tag=fd_top

Good, I will never install that POS Sun JVM on my computer, if its in SP2 then it will be disabled.

Just my opinion here.. but I use the Sun Java VM on most the machines I have and use, and I really don't have a problem with it in the least bit...

Its the fact that the court has decided WE WILL have SUN's JVM thats what I don't like.

I want the choice of MS's, SUN's JVM or none.

It had better run as a service so I can disable it.

Very true... they should put it in as an option, not as something that HAS to be installed on every install...

J speaks....

J, I ORDER you you to INSTALL and USE Sun's JVM!!!! ARGGGHHHHH

*kicks sun in the butt* stupid company...

i use sun

lunix ain't unix nor is it sun.. it is based on unix but sun don't make it so your not using sun

on a friendlier note: I don't really mind ether MS Java or Sun, whatever is faster and easier on system resources is what I'll use .

i use sun
not at home :P
at uni

This document details the difficulties that keep our Solaris Java implementation from being practical for the development of common software applications. It represents a consensus of several senior engineers within Sun Microsystems. We believe that our Java implementation is inappropriate for a large number of categories of software application. We do not believe these flaws are inherent in the Java platform but that they relate to difficulties in our Solaris implementation.
We all agree that the Java language offers many advantages over the alternatives. We would generally prefer to deploy our applications in Java but the implementation provided for Solaris is inadequate to the task of producing supportable and reliable products.



http://www.internalmemos.com/memos/memodet...hp?memo_id=1321