ive come to the decision before even watching t3 that it must be crap

t rated 18
t2 rated 18
t3 rated 12

ok so lets get this right u can watch the last one if ur 12 but not legaly watch the others

rated 12 that means t3 has a crap story line no violance no sex nothing good at all

what is it with films now adays

there are very few high rated films

I was looking forward to this film until I saw its rating, now I am unsure about it

Why would 12 year olds want to see T3 obviously they are too young to have seen T1 and T2

This annoys me, why do they have to dumb down films just so the majority can see them

I believe its a 12a so younger than 12 year olds can see if acompanyed by a parent

It was ok... visual effects were really good....

well, the ratings reflect the current social acceptance of violence and sexual conduct...so thats about right...18 10 years ago is what we would let a 12 year old see now...

I don't know about the rest of you, but I miss the days when they would use actors and actresses in movies that were made from a script written by a screen writer and not a special effects guy. Wow, THOSE were the days, huh?

i liked it..

yer but think of all the screaming kids while trying to watch film

T3 was alright....

I agree. It wasn't that long ago that even nudity wasn't IN films. Now it's pretty much acceptable for 12-13 year olds to have already seen explicit scenes of sex. Not even sex, just shows on Prime Time TV when 12-13 year olds are still awake, like that one show on FOX Paradise Hotel or whatever. Stuff sure has changed

well one must also remember that EUROPE is very LIBERAL compared to the AMERICANS and CANADIANS!

no, T3 wasn't allright... james cameron might have been able to do something decent of this sequel. this director, whatshisname, sure couldn't.
and yeah, what's with the kiddie rating? must be the total absence of blood and gore

no blood and gore

im NOT going to see